ONE STEP MORE: THE HEROISM OF FRODO BAGGINS
by Connie Marie Anderson, Ph.D.
Indiana Jones.
Captain Kirk. Han Solo. The Road
Warrior. Conan the Barbarian. These are the heroes who populated the
silver screen for much of my youth. I
loved them all. I still do.
But they are no comfort to me now.
They are all “action” heroes, you see. They are unremittingly masculine, in the
shallowest sense of the word. They are
physically strong, brimming with confidence and swagger. Their challenges are near impossible, their
courage unfailing…and one never doubts they’ll win in the end. How could they not, with their
self-assurance, athletic prowess and quick-wittedness?
They rarely suffer although they may indulge in some hard
liquor if their nemesis murders their lady-love or buddy-partner.
Indiana Jones
sits in a bar in Cairo, whiskey bottle and glass before him. Marion, he believes, has just been blown to
smithereens. In a few minutes he’ll
engage in cutting repartee with his arch-enemy and then get back to the
business of finding the Lost Ark.
Often, the true love or partner’s death is just an excuse
for the hero’s righteous vengeance.
Conan leaves
Valeria’s funeral pyre and goes to demolish Thulsa Doom. He has not wept over his warrior-love. Indeed, their friend Subatai does so,
saying, “He is Conan. He cannot
cry. So I cry for him.” But Conan can
get mighty violent when he’s torn up inside.
That he can do.
Sometimes, the loved one’s demise does leave the hero
suffering, but in an emotionally cut-off sense that makes of him a wounded,
seething, trigger-happy loner.
Remember “Mad
Max”?
Women, on the other hand, are rarely portrayed as heroes
unless they take on “masculine” attributes.
Xena, the gorgeous and indomitable Warrior Princess, comes to mind. How about Sarah Connor of The Terminator? Once she understands what the future will
bring, she transforms herself from “nice girl who waits tables” to
“muscle-bound, weapon toting, grim-hearted fighter”. And I love watching her do it. But…
I am female. I am
forty-three. I am struggling with heavy
sorrows, and so are many of those around me.
One friend suffers horrific, waking PTSD[i]
flashbacks after two brutal rapes; another has just discovered his little
daughter has inherited the genetic disorder he carries; and another has had to
learn to walk again after a devastating leg injury that will impair her for
life. As for me, I have been told my young
son is on “the autism spectrum” –high-functioning but permanently affected.
Even if we did learn kung-fu fighting, it would avail us
little.
Many of us are parents of young children. All of us have to hold it together through
some of the deepest anguish we’ve ever experienced.
In truth, this is the
nature of most human suffering.
Caring for a parent with Alzheimer’s, trying to cope with
the loss of a loved one, living with an abusive partner, surviving in a war
zone or in poverty, even getting up every day and going to a job you hate so
your kids can eat… Though they may have
a clear beginning, these experiences have no clear end. So much must be borne over months and years
while we get on with the business of living, our experience bleached of drama
but not of pain. Furthermore, our
“enemies” are often impossible to confront.
Like geo-political conflicts or the global economy, they are too
big. Like cancer cells, faulty genetic
code or neurotransmitters run amuck, they are too small.
So few of our human struggles are like what we see in the
movies. The Big Crisis. The Tangible Enemy. The Final Battle. The Hero Wins or Dies Gloriously. Tie it up with a ribbon.
Fade to black. The end.
Which brings us back to action heroes. Schwarzeneggar. Willis. Segal.
When I feel inadequate, heartbroken and hopeless, I find no
inspiration in the exploits of these macho know-it-alls, for so much of my
energy is spent on just getting through the day. Neither can I relate to sappy “Movie of the Week” type stories
about people who overcome the disease, disaster or crime du jour. These are too maudlin, too boring, and too
unattached from larger systems of meaning.
There is only one hero who inspires me now. His name is Frodo Baggins.
At first glance, you’d think that bachelor hobbits and
run-of-the-mill 21st century mothers would have very little in
common. But in my darker moments –the
darkest, most despairing moments I experience as a human being—there is no one
I relate to more than Frodo. No one.
You know about Frodo, don’t you? From J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings”?[ii]
Frodo is a hobbit, a member of a small, hairy-footed race
that inhabits one idyllic corner of Middle Earth. His task is to destroy the One Ring. The Ring is an object reeking of pure evil that will work its
corruption upon him as he struggles to physically, mentally, and spiritually
hold himself together long enough to bear It to the Cracks of Doom, the one
place It can be annihilated. In a
sense, it’s a race. Will he make it to
Mount Doom before he is soul-destroyed?
Bearing the Ring is a horrific Fate, a destiny Frodo feels
too small and afraid to embrace. Yet
there is no one else. He must embrace it…or turn from it and let
Middle Earth fall into Shadow.
He does not turn from this Fate. He weeps with dread, he staggers with exhaustion, but he never
gives up. The vile Ring tears at his
soul, but he does not flee in terror nor lay down and die. Even knowing the cursed object is ripping
him apart, he forces himself to take one step more…and then another. By the end he is literally crawling. His beloved friend, Sam, must pick him up
and carry him.
Frodo is anything but macho. He is male, but he is a hobbit, and they are open with their feelings,
wearing their hearts on their sleeves.
Good friends unselfconsciously touch one another, freely hug one
another, smile and shed tears with equal ease.
They may sometimes be provincial and ignorant, but there is no arrogant
swagger to our hero and his closest friends –Sam, Merry, and Pippin. They are genuine. They represent a nurturing masculinity that expresses traits more
usually thought of as “feminine”. When
Frodo is exhausted, starving, in terror –it shows.
Maybe that’s why some people can’t stand him.
Not everybody is fond of Frodo Baggins. Some people downright detest him. They complain that he “whines”. They gripe because he claimed the Ring in
the end, the wuss! They insinuate that
he is “gay”. (If Frodo Baggins can be
mistaken for “gay”, gay people should be proud.)
Frodo’s detractors want him to be free of doubt. They want him to be strong and silent. They want him to be victorious.
They want him to be an action hero.
I think he threatens the heck out of them. But why?
Frodo has doubts, loads of them. He’s not sure he’s going to make it. In fact, he’s pretty sure he isn’t and he doesn’t mind saying
so. In “The Two Towers” book, Sam
expresses concern that their food might last to Mt. Doom, but it won’t last
long enough to get them back. Frodo
says:
“But Samwise Gamgee, my dear hobbit –indeed, Sam my dearest hobbit, friend of friends—I do not think we need give thought to what comes after that. To do the job, as you put it –what hope is there that we ever shall? And if we do, who knows what will come of that? If the One goes into the Fire, and we are at hand? I ask you, Sam, are we ever likely to need bread again? I think not. If we can nurse our limbs to bring us to Mount Doom, that is all we can do. More than I can, I begin to feel.”[iii]
Action heroes never surrender to Fate. Action heroes are in control. They do not acquiesce to Fate, but somehow
bend it to their will. Because they are
able to do this, they minimize their own suffering. Why should they suffer when they have the power to change things? If they engage with Fate at all, it is in a very uplifting way
for it is always their Fate to come out on top.
Frodo is not passive.
He fights, resists, shows mercy, makes choices. Yet he is caught up in a mytho-historic
drama much bigger than himself. He bows
to it, slowly coming to accept the dreadful burden that will cost him
absolutely everything. Although he must
confront external evil at times, his chief task is to weather the slow torment
of his own soul as he slowly creeps closer to Mordor. His suffering is terrible, and there is little action he can take
to alleviate it. He can only endure.
Action heroes do not speak the truth of their pain. They don’t talk about their troubles. They don’t weep or need reassurance. They don’t do anything that might seem too
female-like. In a misogynistic,
homophobic society, we require our action heroes to be stoic except when it
comes to rage of the hot or cold variety.
Love motivates them, but only through the medium of vengeance. When they lose their partner, wife, child to
some hideous evil, their pain is expressed through violent retribution.
Frodo is ever so reluctantly violent. He is a dreamer, a scholarly introvert, not
a warrior, and he dares to speak his pain.
He never “whines”, but he does express sadness and regret, fear and
hopelessness.
It is “movie” Frodo I think of now, standing on the banks of
the Anduin, holding the Ring in his outstretched hand. Tears stream down his face. He is trying to
steel himself to go on with the Ring alone –the only thing he can do to protect
his friends. He thinks: “I wish the
Ring had never come to me. I wish none
of this had happened.”[iv]
Who can blame him for his terror and his grief?
Frodo does go on, with loyal Sam as his only companion. He marches on foot through desolate
landscapes with little hope in his heart and little food in his belly. Of the
horrific battle raging inside him, he barely speaks. It is not until Sam asks if he remembers a special meal they’d
enjoyed in better times that Frodo admits:
“No, I am afraid not, Sam. At least, I know that such things happened,
but I cannot see them. No taste of
food, no feel of water, no sound of wind, no memory of tree or grass or flower,
no image of moon or star are left to me.
I am naked in the dark, Sam, and there is no veil between me and the
wheel of fire. I begin to see it even
with my waking eyes, and all else fades.”[v]
This is not whining.
This is telling it like it is.
Action heroes always win.
This goes without saying, doesn’t it? Action heroes emerge victorious. Furthermore, their victory is unblemished
and totally theirs.
Frodo doesn’t win, not exactly. He makes it to Mount Doom, thanks to his unflagging efforts and
Sam’s blessed help, but he does not cast the Ring into the Fire. After spending all his spiritual and
physical strength getting there, he is no match for a Ring made all-powerful by
proximity to its nefarious birth place. He does what he has been warned never
to do and what he has struggled against for months. He puts it on. He
succumbs. He “fails”.
He is only human, hobbit or no.
When the One is destroyed it is not through Frodo’s efforts
alone. His goal is achieved and Middle
Earth is saved, but his role in the triumph is only partial. Although he sacrificed everything he had
–body, mind, will, heart, soul—he is granted neither unadulterated victory nor
glorious death.
And, of course, when it is all over and he can go home, he is
never the same.
He does not collapse in despair. He labors over the Red Book, for example, chronicling his quest
and the War of the Ring. He is
supportive of Sam, encouraging him to marry and inviting him and his bride to
live at Bag End. Still, he can find no peace.
He is plagued with nightmares and other symptoms of PTSD, not to mention
the spiritual aftereffects of carrying the cursed Ring. His wounds do not heal. His “illness” worsens. Finally, he comes to accept that he must bid
farewell to all he loves and seek healing beyond Middle Earth.
Pain. Doubt. Powerlessness. Human Frailty. An Ending
That Feels So Unfair.
Frodo is too real
for some people, and their ridicule reflects the degree of their
discomfort. His suffering is
frightening, too symbolically close to what they bear or what they might bear, down the road. They want to relate to winners, manipulators
of Fate, people who are in control, people who can’t be hurt. They want action heroes and a feel-good
ending.
But those action heroes…
They don’t look like anybody we know, least of all ourselves. And those candy-coated, Hollywood
happily-ever-afters… They are a cheat, far removed from what most of us can
expect from this life.
How ironic. “The
Lord of the Rings” has been dismissed by some as an escapist fantasy, yet Frodo
Baggins is more “real” than contemporary movie heroes like Martin (Lethal Weapon) Riggs or John (Die Hard) McClane. He is small. He is afraid. His heart
is heavy. He does not always win. When it’s all just too much for him, he may
speak his pain or shed tears.
He is like us.
How I love him for it, for all of it. It is Frodo who is the “real” hero. He bows to Fate, but he is not passive. He makes sacrifices, but he is no victim. He weeps, but he is no weakling. He quails, but he never gives up.
My friends and I –and many other people marching through
this life with heavy burdens—also feel small and afraid, all the more so if we
are disempowered by virtue of our social class or role, our color, our
gender. Each day is hard. There is no clear victory, no clear ending
and, yes, there are days when we sit down and cry.
What have macho action heroes to offer us? Nothing real. Nothing lasting.
Frodo, on the other hand, inspires and empowers. However exotic his circumstances, I can
relate to him. He is tired and scared,
as am I. He has been promised no reward,
no glory. Nor have I. Love propels him onward even when his heart
is breaking, something I can understand.
When I am defeated, when I am so exhausted and full of
despair I don’t think I can carry on one more second, when I am tempted to give
up, I think of Frodo. Frodo on that
river bank. Frodo in the Dead
Marshes. Frodo in Mordor.
Then I somehow find it within myself to take one step
more.
With Frodo as my inspiration, I know I always will.
[i] Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
[ii] Tolkien, J.R.R., “The Lord of the Rings” in 3 volumes (“The Fellowship of the Ring”, “The Two Towers”, “The Return of the King”), 1954-1955, Ballantine Books, New York, NY.
[iii] Tolkien, J.R.R., “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers”, 1954, Ballantine Books, New York, pg. 257.
[iv] Jackson, P. “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”, New Line Cinema, 2001.
[v] Tolkien, J.R.R., “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King”, 1955, Ballantine Books, New York, pg. 229-230.